May 13, 2010

1990:

What if a small group of these world leaders were to conclude that the principle risk to the Earth come from the actions of the rich countries? …in order to save the planet, the group decided: isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?

What Are We Looking For?

1. Group of people (small - global)
2. Threat to Earth
3. Rich countries are problem
4. Collapse system - C/P
5. Control

(1). The People - All the Presidents men: Van Jones, John Holdren (radical views on forced abortion and sterilizing drinking water were under scrutiny), Barrack Obama (sat with a pastor for twenty years who was a Jew hating crazy guy who HATES America), Anita Done (China president, Mao Se Tung [communist], is who she admires the most along with Mother Teresa), etc,…

(2). Global Government - Maurice Strong - “This interlocking… is the new reality of the century, with profound implications for the shape of our institutions of governance, national and international… by the year 2012, these changes must be fully integrated into our economic and political life.” (Beyond Interdependence, 1991)

(3). Emergency Plan - Maurice Strong’s Real Goal - “The real goal of the Earth charter is that it will in fact become like the ten commandments.” (1990)

John Holdren on Population Control - “A government might require only implantation of the contraceptive capsule, leaving its removal to the individual’s discretion but requiring reimplantation after childbirth.” (Ecoscience, 1977)

(4). Redistribution of Wealth - Barrack Obama - “[I think] One of the tragedies of the civil rights movement was, uh, because it became so court focused that there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change. In some ways we still suffer from that.” (Chicago Public Radio, 2001)

(5). CONTROL - “What can the government do about conspiracy theories, and what should it do? 1) Government might ban “conspiracy theories,” somehow defined. 2) Government might impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate sure theories. 3) Government might itself engage in counter speech marshaling arguments to discredit conspiracy theories. 4) Government might formally hire credible private parties to engage in counter speech. 5) Government might engage in informal communication with such parties encouraging them to help.” (Conspiracy Theories causes and curses, May 7, 2009)

CRIME INC BASICS:
Who: ?

What: Theft of Rights and $
When: Happening NOW
Why: $ --> Power and Control